|
emma
|
Function
Multiple alignment program - interface to ClustalW program
Description
EMMA calculates the multiple alignment of nucleic acid or protein
sequences according to the method of Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G.
and Gibson, T.J. (1994).
This is an interface to the ClustalW distribution.
The basic alignment method
The basic multiple alignment algorithm consists of three main stages: 1) all
pairs of sequences are aligned separately in order to calculate a distance matrix
giving the divergence of each pair of sequences; 2) a guide tree is calculated
from the distance matrix; 3) the sequences are progressively aligned according
to the branching order in the guide tree. An example using 7 globin
sequences of known tertiary structure (25) is given in figure 1.
1) The distance matrix/pairwise alignments
In the original CLUSTAL programs, the pairwise distances were calculated
using a fast approximate method (22). This allows very large numbers of
sequences to be aligned, even on a microcomputer. The scores are calculated
as the number of k-tuple matches (runs of identical residues, typically 1 or 2
long for proteins or 2 to 4 long for nucleotide sequences) in the best alignment
between two sequences minus a fixed penalty for every gap. We now offer a
choice between this method and the slower but more accurate scores from full
dynamic programming alignments using two gap penalties (for opening or
extending gaps) and a full amino acid weight matrix. These scores are
calculated as the number of identities in the best alignment divided by the
number of residues compared (gap positions are excluded). Both of these
scores are initially calculated as percent identity scores and are converted to
distances by dividing by 100 and subtracting from 1.0 to give number of
differences per site. We do not correct for multiple substitutions in these
initial distances. In figure 1 we give the 7x7 distance matrix between the 7
globin sequences calculated using the full dynamic programming method.
2) The guide tree
The trees used to guide the final multiple alignment process are calculated
from the distance matrix of step 1 using the Neighbour-Joining method (21).
This produces unrooted trees with branch lengths proportional to estimated
divergence along each branch. The root is placed by a "mid-point" method
(15) at a position where the means of the branch lengths on either side of the
root are equal. These trees are also used to derive a weight for each sequence
(15). The weights are dependent upon the distance from the root of the tree
but sequences which have a common branch with other sequences share the
weight derived from the shared branch. In the example in figure 1, the
leghaemoglobin (Lgb2_Luplu) gets a weight of 0.442 which is equal to the
length of the branch from the root to it. The Human beta globin
(Hbb_Human) gets a weight consisting of the length of the branch leading to
it that is not shared with any other sequences (0.081) plus half the length of
the branch shared with the horse beta globin (0.226/2) plus one quarter the
length of the branch shared by all four haemoglobins (0.061/4) plus one fifth
the branch shared between the haemoglobins and the myoglobin (0.015/5)
plus one sixth the branch leading to all the vertebrate globins (0.062). This
sums to a total of 0.221. By contrast, in the normal progressive alignment
algorithm, all sequences would be equally weighted. The rooted tree with
branch lengths and sequence weights for the 7 globins is given in figure 1.
3) Progressive alignment
The basic procedure at this stage is to use a series of pairwise alignments to
align larger and larger groups of sequences, following the branching order in
the guide tree. You proceed from the tips of the rooted tree towards the root.
In the globin example in figure 1 you align the sequences in the following
order: human vs. horse beta globin; human vs. horse alpha globin; the 2
alpha globins vs. the 2 beta globins; the myoglobin vs. the haemoglobins; the
cyanohaemoglobin vs the haemoglobins plus myoglobin; the leghaemoglobin
vs. all the rest. At each stage a full dynamic programming (26,27) algorithm is
used with a residue weight matrix and penalties for opening and extending
gaps. Each step consists of aligning two existing alignments or sequences.
Gaps that are present in older alignments remain fixed. In the basic
algorithm, new gaps that are introduced at each stage get full gap opening and
extension penalties, even if they are introduced inside old gap positions (see
the section on gap penalties below for modifications to this rule). In order to
calculate the score between a position from one sequence or alignment and
one from another, the average of all the pairwise weight matrix scores from
the amino acids in the two sets of sequences is used i.e. if you align 2
alignments with 2 and 4 sequences respectively, the score at each position is
the average of 8 (2x4) comparisons. This is illustrated in figure 2. If either set
of sequences contains one or more gaps in one of the positions being
considered, each gap versus a residue is scored as zero. The default amino
acid weight matrices we use are rescored to have only positive values.
Therefore, this treatment of gaps treats the score of a residue versus a gap as
having the worst possible score. When sequences are weighted (see
improvements to progressive alignment, below), each weight matrix value is
multiplied by the weights from the 2 sequences, as illustrated in figure 2.
Improvements to progressive alignment
All of the remaining modifications apply only to the final progressive
alignment stage. Sequence weighting is relatively straightforward and is
already widely used in profile searches (15,16). The treatment of gap penalties
is more complicated. Initial gap penalties are calculated depending on the
weight matrix, the similarity of the sequences, and the length of the
sequences. Then, an attempt is made to derive sensible local gap opening
penalties at every position in each pre-aligned group of sequences that will
vary as new sequences are added. The use of different weight matrices as the
alignment progresses is novel and largely by-passes the problem of initial
choice of weight matrix. The final modification allows us to delay the
addition of very divergent sequences until the end of the alignment process
when all of the more closely related sequences have already been aligned.
Sequence weighting
Sequence weights are calculated directly from the guide tree. The weights
are normalised such that the biggest one is set to 1.0 and the rest are all less
than one. Groups of closely related sequences receive lowered weights
because they contain much duplicated information. Highly divergent
sequences without any close relatives receive high weights. These weights
are used as simple multiplication factors for scoring positions from different
sequences or prealigned groups of sequences. The method is illustrated in
figure 2. In the globin example in figure 1, the two alpha globins get
downweighted because they are almost duplicate sequences (as do the two
beta globins); they receive a combined weight of only slightly more than if a
single alpha globin was used.
Initial gap penalties
Initially, two gap penalties are used: a gap opening penalty (GOP) which gives
the cost of opening a new gap of any length and a gap extension penalty (GEP)
which gives the cost of every item in a gap. Initial values can be set by the
user from a menu. The software then automatically attempts to choose
appropriate gap penalties for each sequence alignment, depending on the
following factors.
1) Dependence on the weight matrix
It has been shown (16,28) that varying the gap penalties used with different
weight matrices can improve the accuracy of sequence alignments. Here, we
use the average score for two mismatched residues (ie. off-diagonal values in
the matrix) as a scaling factor for the GOP.
2) Dependence on the similarity of the sequences
The percent identity of the two (groups of) sequences to be aligned is used to
increase the GOP for closely related sequences and decrease it for more
divergent sequences on a linear scale.
3) Dependence on the lengths of the sequences
The scores for both true and false sequence alignments grow with the length
of the sequences. We use the logarithm of the length of the shorter sequence
to increase the GOP with sequence length.
Using these three modifications, the initial GOP calculated by the program is:
GOP->(GOP+log(MIN(N,M))) * (average residue mismatch score) * (percent identity scaling factor)
where N, M are the lengths of the two sequences.
4) Dependence on the difference in the lengths of the sequences
The GEP is modified depending on the difference between the lengths of the
two sequences to be aligned. If one sequence is much shorter than the other,
the GEP is increased to inhibit too many long gaps in the shorter sequence.
The initial GEP calculated by the program is:
GEP -> GEP*(1.0+|log(N/M)|)
where N, M are the lengths of the two sequences.
Position-specific gap penalties
In most dynamic programming applications, the initial gap opening and
extension penalties are applied equally at every position in the sequence,
regardless of the location of a gap, except for terminal gaps which are usually
allowed at no cost. In CLUSTAL W, before any pair of sequences or
prealigned groups of sequences are aligned, we generate a table of gap opening
penalties for every position in the two (sets of) sequences. An example is
shown in figure 3. We manipulate the initial gap opening penalty in a
position specific manner, in order to make gaps more or less likely at different
positions.
The local gap penalty modification rules are applied in a hierarchical manner.
The exact details of each rule are given below. Firstly, if there is a gap at a
position, the gap opening and gap extension penalties are lowered; the other
rules do not apply. This makes gaps more likely at positions where there are
already gaps. If there is no gap at a position, then the gap opening penalty is
increased if the position is within 8 residues of an existing gap. This
discourages gaps that are too close together. Finally, at any position within a
run of hydrophilic residues, the penalty is decreased. These runs usually
indicate loop regions in protein structures. If there is no run of hydrophilic
residues, the penalty is modified using a table of residue specific gap
propensities (12). These propensities were derived by counting the frequency
of each residue at either end of gaps in alignments of proteins of known
structure. An illustration of the application of these rules from one part of
the globin example, in figure 1, is given in figure 3.
1) Lowered gap penalties at existing gaps
If there are already gaps at a position, then the GOP is reduced in proportion
to the number of sequences with a gap at this position and the GEP is lowered
by a half. The new gap opening penalty is calculated as:
GOP -> GOP*0.3*(no. of sequences without a gap/no. of sequences).
2) Increased gap penalties near existing gaps
If a position does not have any gaps but is within 8 residues of an existing gap,
the GOP is increased by:
GOP -> GOP*(2+((8-distance from gap)*2)/8)
3) Reduced gap penalties in hydrophilic stretches
Any run of 5 hydrophilic residues is considered to be a hydrophilic stretch.
The residues that are to be considered hydrophilic may be set by the user but
are conservatively set to D, E, G, K, N, Q, P, R or S by default. If, at any
position, there are no gaps and any of the sequences has such a stretch, the
GOP is reduced by one third.
4) Residue specific penalties
If there is no hydrophilic stretch and the position does not contain any gaps,
then the GOP is multiplied by one of the 20 numbers in table 1, depending on
the residue. If there is a mixture of residues at a position, the multiplication
factor is the average of all the contributions from each sequence.
Weight matrices
Two main series of weight matrices are offered to the user: the Dayhoff PAM
series (3) and the BLOSUM series (4). The default is the BLOSUM series. In
each case, there is a choice of matrix ranging from strict ones, useful for
comparing very closely related sequences to very "soft" ones that are useful
for comparing very distantly related sequences. Depending on the distance
between the two sequences or groups of sequences to be compared, we switch
between 4 different matrices. The distances are measured directly from the
guide tree. The ranges of distances and tables used with the PAM series of
matrices is: 80-100%:PAM20, 60-80%:PAM60, 40-60%:PAM120, 0-40%:PAM350.
The range used with the BLOSUM series is:80-100%:BLOSUM80,
60-80%:BLOSUM62, 30-60%:BLOSUM45, 0-30%:BLOSUM30.
Divergent sequences
The most divergent sequences (most different, on average from all of the
other sequences) are usually the most difficult to align correctly. It is
sometimes better to delay the incorporation of these sequences until all of the
more easily aligned sequences are merged first. This may give a better chance
of correctly placing the gaps and matching weakly conserved positions against
the rest of the sequences. A choice is offered to set a cut off (default is 40%
identity or less with any other sequence) that will delay the alignment of the
divergent sequences until all of the rest have been aligned.
Software and Algorithms
Dynamic Programming
The most demanding part of the multiple alignment strategy, in terms of
computer processing and memory usage, is the alignment of two (groups of)
sequences at each step in the final progressive alignment. To make it
possible to align very long sequences (e.g. dynein heavy chains at ~ 5,000
residues) in a reasonable amount of memory, we use the memory efficient
dynamic programming algorithm of Myers and Miller (26). This sacrifices
some processing time but makes very large alignments practical in very little
memory. One disadvantage of this algorithm is that it does not allow
different gap opening and extension penalties at each position. We have
modified the algorithm so as to allow this and the details are described in a
separate paper (27).
Alignment to an alignment
Profile alignment is used to align two existing alignments (either of which
may consist of just one sequence) or to add a series of new sequences to an
existing alignment. This is useful because one may wish to build up a
multiple alignment gradually, choosing different parameters manually, or
correcting intermediate errors as the alignment proceeds. Often, just a few
sequences cause misalignments in the progressive algorithm and these can be
removed from the process and then added at the end by profile alignment. A
second use is where one has a high quality reference alignment and wishes to
keep it fixed while adding new sequences automatically.
Terminal Gaps
In the original Clustal V program, terminal gaps were penalised the same
as all other gaps. This caused some ugly side effects e.g.
acgtacgtacgtacgt acgtacgtacgtacgt
a----cgtacgtacgt gets the same score as ----acgtacgtacgt
NOW, terminal gaps are free. This is better on average and stops silly
effects like single residues jumping to the edge of the alignment. However,
it is not perfect. It does mean that if there should be a gap near the end
of the alignment, the program may be reluctant to insert it i.e.
cccccgggccccc cccccgggccccc
ccccc---ccccc may be considered worse (lower score) than cccccccccc---
In the right hand case above, the terminal gap is free and may score higher
than the laft hand alignment. This can be prevented by lowering the gap
opening and extension penalties. It is difficult to get this right all the
time. Please watch the ends of your alignments.
Speed of the initial (pairwise) alignments (fast approximate/slow accurate)
By default, the initial pairwise alignments are now carried out using a full
dynamic programming algorithm. This is more accurate than the older hash/
k-tuple based alignments (Wilbur and Lipman) but is MUCH slower. On a fast
workstation you may not notice but on a slow box, the difference is extreme.
You can set the alignment method from the menus easily to the older, faster
method.
Delaying alignment of distant sequences
The user can set a cut off to delay the alignment of the most divergent
sequences in a data set until all other sequences have been aligned. By
default, this is set to 40% which means that if a sequence is less than 40%
identical to any other sequence, its alignment will be delayed.
Iterative realignment/Reset gaps between alignments
By default, if you align a set of sequences a second time (e.g. with changed
gap penalties), the gaps from the first alignment are discarded. You can
set this from the menus so that older gaps will be kept between alignments,
This can sometimes give better alignments by keeping the gaps (do not reset
them) and doing the full multiple alignment a second time. Sometimes, the
alignment will converge on a better solution; sometimes the new alignment will
be the same as the first. There can be a strange side effect: you can get
columns of nothing but gaps introduced.
Any gaps that are read in from the input file are always kept, regardless
of the setting of this switch. If you read in a full multiple alignment, the "reset
gaps" switch has no effect. The old gaps will remain and if you carry out
a multiple alignment, any new gaps will be added in. If you wish to carry out
a full new alignment of a set of sequences that are already aligned in a file
you must input the sequences without gaps.
Profile alignment
By profile alignment, we simply mean the alignment of old alignments/sequences.
In this context, a profile is just an existing alignment (or even a set of
unaligned sequences; see below). This allows you to
read in an old alignment (in any of the allowed input formats) and align
one or more new sequences to it. From the profile alignment menu, you
are allowed to read in 2 profiles. Either profile can be a full alignment
OR a single sequence. In the simplest mode, you simply align the two profiles
to each other. This is useful if you want to gradually build up a full
multiple alignment.
A second option is to align the sequences from the second profile, one at
a time to the first profile. This is done, taking the underlying tree between
the sequences into account. This is useful if you have a set of new sequences
(not aligned) and you wish to add them all to an older alignment.
Changes to the phylogentic tree calculations and some hints
Improved distance calculations for protein trees
The phylogenetic trees in Clustal W (the real trees that you calculate
AFTER alignment; not the guide trees used to decide the branching order
for multiple alignment) use the Neighbor-Joining method of Saitou and
Nei based on a matrix of "distances" between all sequences. These distances
can be corrected for "multiple hits". This is normal practice when accurate
trees are needed. This correction stretches distances (especially large ones)
to try to correct for the fact that OBSERVED distances (mean number of
differences per site) greatly underestimate the actual number that happened
during evolution.
In Clustal V we used a simple formula to convert an observed distance to one
that is corrected for multiple hits. The observed distance is the mean number
of differences per site in an alignment (ignoring sites with a gap) and is
therefore always between 0.0 (for ientical sequences) an 1.0 (no residues the
same at any site). These distances can be multiplied by 100 to give percent
difference values. 100 minus percent difference gives percent identity.
The formula we use to correct for multiple hits is from Motoo Kimura
(Kimura, M. The neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution, Camb.Univ.Press, 1983,
page 75) and is:
K = -Ln(1 - D - (D.D)/5)
where D is the observed distance and K is
corrected distance.
This formula gives mean number of estimated substitutions per site and, in
contrast to D (the observed number), can be greater than 1 i.e. more than
one substitution per site, on average. For example, if you observe 0.8
differences per site (80% difference; 20% identity), then the above formula
predicts that there have been 2.5 substitutions per site over the course
of evolution since the 2 sequences diverged. This can also be expressed in
PAM units by multiplying by 100 (mean number of substitutions per 100 residues).
The PAM scale of evolution and its derivation/calculation comes from the
work of Margaret Dayhoff and co workers (the famous Dayhoff PAM series
of weight matrices also came from this work). Dayhoff et al constructed
an elaborate model of protein evolution based on observed frequencies
of substitution between very closely related proteins. Using this model,
they derived a table relating observed distances to predicted PAM distances.
Kimura's formula, above, is just a "curve fitting" approximation to this table.
It is very accurate in the range 0.75 > D > 0.0 but becomes increasingly
unaccurate at high D (>0.75) and fails completely at around D = 0.85.
To circumvent this problem, we calculated all the values for K corresponding
to D above 0.75 directly using the Dayhoff model and store these in an
internal table, used by Clustal W. This table is declared in the file dayhoff.h and
gives values of K for all D between 0.75 and 0.93 in intervals of 0.001 i.e.
for D = 0.750, 0.751, 0.752 ...... 0.929, 0.930. For any observed D
higher than 0.930, we arbitrarily set K to 10.0. This sounds drastic but
with real sequences, distances of 0.93 (less than 7% identity) are rare.
If your data set includes sequences with this degree of divergence, you
will have great difficulty getting accurate trees by ANY method; the alignment
itself will be very difficult (to construct and to evaluate).
There are some important
things to note. Firstly, this formula works well if your sequences are
of average amino acid composition and if the amino acids substitute according
to the original Dayhoff model. In other cases, it may be misleading. Secondly,
it is based only on observed percent distance i.e. it does not DIRECTLY
take conservative substitutions into account. Thirdly, the error on the
estimated PAM distances may be VERY great for high distances; at very high
distance (e.g. over 85%) it may give largely arbitrary corrected distances.
In most cases, however, the correction is still worth using; the trees will
be more accurate and the branch lengths will be more realistic.
A far more sophisticated distance correction based on a full Dayhoff
model which DOES take conservative substitutions and actual amino acid
composition into account, may be found in the PROTDIST program of the
PHYLIP package. For serious tree makers, this program is highly recommended.
TWO NOTES ON BOOTSTRAPPING...
When you use the BOOTSTRAP in Clustal W to estimate the reliability of parts
of a tree, many of the uncorrected distances may randomly exceed the arbitrary cut
off of 0.93 (sequences only 7% identical) if the sequences are distantly
related. This will happen randomly i.e. even if none of the pairs of
sequences are less than 7% identical, the bootstrap samples may contain pairs
of sequences that do exceed this cut off.
If this happens, you will be warned. In practice, this can
happen with many data sets. It is not a serious problem if it happens rarely.
If it does happen (you are warned when it happens and told how often the
problem occurs), you should consider removing the most distantly
related sequences and/or using the PHYLIP package instead.
A further problem arises in almost exactly the opposite situation: when
you bootstrap a data set which contains 3 or more sequences that are identical
or almost identical. Here, the sets of identical sequences should be shown
as a multifurcation (several sequences joing at the same part of the tree).
Because the Neighbor-Joining method only gives strictly dichotomous trees
(never more than 2 sequences join at one time), this cannot be exactly
represented. In practice, this is NOT a problem as there will be some
internal branches of zero length seperating the sequences. If you
display the tree with all branch lengths, you will still see a multifurcation.
However, when you bootstrap
the tree, only the branching orders are stored and counted. In the case
of multifurcations, the exact branching order is arbitrary but the program
will always get the same branching order, depending only on the input order
of the sequences. In practice, this is only a problem in situations where
you have a set of sequences where all of them are VERY similar. In this case,
you can find very high support for some groupings which will disappear if you
run the analysis with a different input order. Again, the PHYLIP package
deals with this by offering a JUMBLE option to shuffle the input order
of your sequences between each bootstrap sample.
Usage
Here is a sample session with emma
% emma
Multiple alignment program - interface to ClustalW program
Input (gapped) sequence(s): globins.fasta
output sequence set [hbb_human.aln]:
Dendrogram (tree file) from clustalw output file [hbb_human.dnd]:
CLUSTAL W (1.83) Multiple Sequence Alignments
Sequence type explicitly set to Protein
Sequence format is Pearson
Sequence 1: HBB_HUMAN 146 aa
Sequence 2: HBB_HORSE 146 aa
Sequence 3: HBA_HUMAN 141 aa
Sequence 4: HBA_HORSE 141 aa
Sequence 5: MYG_PHYCA 153 aa
Sequence 6: GLB5_PETMA 149 aa
Sequence 7: LGB2_LUPLU 153 aa
Start of Pairwise alignments
Aligning...
Sequences (1:2) Aligned. Score: 83
Sequences (1:3) Aligned. Score: 43
Sequences (1:4) Aligned. Score: 42
Sequences (1:5) Aligned. Score: 24
Sequences (1:6) Aligned. Score: 21
Sequences (1:7) Aligned. Score: 14
Sequences (2:3) Aligned. Score: 41
Sequences (2:4) Aligned. Score: 43
Sequences (2:5) Aligned. Score: 24
Sequences (2:6) Aligned. Score: 19
Sequences (2:7) Aligned. Score: 15
Sequences (3:4) Aligned. Score: 87
Sequences (3:5) Aligned. Score: 26
Sequences (3:6) Aligned. Score: 29
Sequences (3:7) Aligned. Score: 16
Sequences (4:5) Aligned. Score: 26
Sequences (4:6) Aligned. Score: 27
Sequences (4:7) Aligned. Score: 12
Sequences (5:6) Aligned. Score: 21
Sequences (5:7) Aligned. Score: 7
Sequences (6:7) Aligned. Score: 11
Guide tree file created: [12345678A]
Start of Multiple Alignment
There are 6 groups
Aligning...
Group 1: Sequences: 2 Score:2194
Group 2: Sequences: 2 Score:2165
Group 3: Sequences: 4 Score:960
Group 4: Delayed
Group 5: Delayed
Group 6: Delayed
Sequence:5 Score:865
Sequence:6 Score:797
Sequence:7 Score:1044
Alignment Score 4164
GCG-Alignment file created [12345678A]
|
Go to the input files for this example
Go to the output files for this example
Command line arguments
Standard (Mandatory) qualifiers:
[-sequence] seqall (Gapped) sequence(s) filename and optional
format, or reference (input USA)
[-outseq] seqoutset [.] Sequence set filename
and optional format (output USA)
[-dendoutfile] outfile [*.emma] Dendrogram (tree file) from
clustalw output file
Additional (Optional) qualifiers (* if not always prompted):
-onlydend toggle [N] Only produce dendrogram file
* -dend toggle [N] Do alignment using an old dendrogram
* -dendfile infile Dendrogram (tree file) from clustalw file
(optional)
* -pwmatrix menu [b] The scoring table which describes the
similarity of each amino acid to each other.
There are three 'in-built' series of weight
matrices offered. Each consists of several
matrices which work differently at different
evolutionary distances. To see the exact
details, read the documentation. Crudely, we
store several matrices in memory, spanning
the full range of amino acid distance (from
almost identical sequences to highly
divergent ones). For very similar sequences,
it is best to use a strict weight matrix
which only gives a high score to identities
and the most favoured conservative
substitutions. For more divergent sequences,
it is appropriate to use 'softer' matrices
which give a high score to many other
frequent substitutions.
1) BLOSUM (Henikoff). These matrices appear
to be the best available for carrying out
data base similarity (homology searches).
The matrices used are: Blosum80, 62, 45 and
30.
2) PAM (Dayhoff). These have been extremely
widely used since the late '70s. We use the
PAM 120, 160, 250 and 350 matrices.
3) GONNET . These matrices were derived
using almost the same procedure as the
Dayhoff one (above) but are much more up to
date and are based on a far larger data set.
They appear to be more sensitive than the
Dayhoff series. We use the GONNET 40, 80,
120, 160, 250 and 350 matrices.
We also supply an identity matrix which
gives a score of 1.0 to two identical amino
acids and a score of zero otherwise. This
matrix is not very useful. (Values: b
(blosum); p (pam); g (gonnet); i (id); o
(own))
* -pwdnamatrix menu [i] The scoring table which describes the
scores assigned to matches and mismatches
(including IUB ambiguity codes). (Values: i
(iub); c (clustalw); o (own))
* -pairwisedatafile infile Comparison matrix file (optional)
* -matrix menu [b] This gives a menu where you are offered
a choice of weight matrices. The default for
proteins is the PAM series derived by
Gonnet and colleagues. Note, a series is
used! The actual matrix that is used depends
on how similar the sequences to be aligned
at this alignment step are. Different
matrices work differently at each
evolutionary distance.
There are three 'in-built' series of weight
matrices offered. Each consists of several
matrices which work differently at different
evolutionary distances. To see the exact
details, read the documentation. Crudely, we
store several matrices in memory, spanning
the full range of amino acid distance (from
almost identical sequences to highly
divergent ones). For very similar sequences,
it is best to use a strict weight matrix
which only gives a high score to identities
and the most favoured conservative
substitutions. For more divergent sequences,
it is appropriate to use 'softer' matrices
which give a high score to many other
frequent substitutions.
1) BLOSUM (Henikoff). These matrices appear
to be the best available for carrying out
data base similarity (homology searches).
The matrices used are: Blosum80, 62, 45 and
30.
2) PAM (Dayhoff). These have been extremely
widely used since the late '70s. We use the
PAM 120, 160, 250 and 350 matrices.
3) GONNET . These matrices were derived
using almost the same procedure as the
Dayhoff one (above) but are much more up to
date and are based on a far larger data set.
They appear to be more sensitive than the
Dayhoff series. We use the GONNET 40, 80,
120, 160, 250 and 350 matrices.
We also supply an identity matrix which
gives a score of 1.0 to two identical amino
acids and a score of zero otherwise. This
matrix is not very useful. Alternatively,
you can read in your own (just one matrix,
not a series). (Values: b (blosum); p (pam);
g (gonnet); i (id); o (own))
* -dnamatrix menu [i] This gives a menu where a single matrix
(not a series) can be selected. (Values: i
(iub); c (clustalw); o (own))
* -mamatrixfile infile Comparison matrix file (optional)'
-[no]slow toggle [Y] A distance is calculated between every
pair of sequences and these are used to
construct the dendrogram which guides the
final multiple alignment. The scores are
calculated from separate pairwise
alignments. These can be calculated using 2
methods: dynamic programming (slow but
accurate) or by the method of Wilbur and
Lipman (extremely fast but approximate).
The slow-accurate method is fine for short
sequences but will be VERY SLOW for many
(e.g. >100) long (e.g. >1000 residue)
sequences.
* -pwgapopen float [10.0] The penalty for opening a gap in the
pairwise alignments. (Number 0.000 or more)
* -pwgapextend float [0.1] The penalty for extending a gap by 1
residue in the pairwise alignments. (Number
0.000 or more)
* -ktup integer [1 for protein, 2 for nucleic] This is the
size of exactly matching fragment that is
used. INCREASE for speed (max= 2 for
proteins; 4 for DNA), DECREASE for
sensitivity. For longer sequences (e.g.
>1000 residues) you may need to increase the
default. (integer from 0 to 4)
* -gapw integer [3 for protein, 5 for nucleic] This is a
penalty for each gap in the fast alignments.
It has little affect on the speed or
sensitivity except for extreme values.
(Positive integer)
* -topdiags integer [5 for protein, 4 for nucleic] The number of
k-tuple matches on each diagonal (in an
imaginary dot-matrix plot) is calculated.
Only the best ones (with most matches) are
used in the alignment. This parameter
specifies how many. Decrease for speed;
increase for sensitivity. (Positive integer)
* -window integer [5 for protein, 4 for nucleic] This is the
number of diagonals around each of the
'best' diagonals that will be used. Decrease
for speed; increase for sensitivity.
(Positive integer)
* -nopercent boolean [N] Fast pairwise alignment: similarity
scores: suppresses percentage score
-gapopen float [10.0] The penalty for opening a gap in the
alignment. Increasing the gap opening
penalty will make gaps less frequent.
(Positive foating point number)
-gapextend float [5.0] The penalty for extending a gap by 1
residue. Increasing the gap extension
penalty will make gaps shorter. Terminal
gaps are not penalised. (Positive foating
point number)
-[no]endgaps boolean [Y] End gap separation: treats end gaps just
like internal gaps for the purposes of
avoiding gaps that are too close (set by
'gap separation distance'). If you turn this
off, end gaps will be ignored for this
purpose. This is useful when you wish to
align fragments where the end gaps are not
biologically meaningful.
-gapdist integer [8] Gap separation distance: tries to
decrease the chances of gaps being too close
to each other. Gaps that are less than this
distance apart are penalised more than
other gaps. This does not prevent close
gaps; it makes them less frequent, promoting
a block-like appearance of the alignment.
(Positive integer)
* -norgap boolean [N] Residue specific penalties: amino acid
specific gap penalties that reduce or
increase the gap opening penalties at each
position in the alignment or sequence. As an
example, positions that are rich in glycine
are more likely to have an adjacent gap
than positions that are rich in valine.
* -hgapres string [GPSNDQEKR] This is a set of the residues
'considered' to be hydrophilic. It is used
when introducing Hydrophilic gap penalties.
(Any string is accepted)
* -nohgap boolean [N] Hydrophilic gap penalties: used to
increase the chances of a gap within a run
(5 or more residues) of hydrophilic amino
acids; these are likely to be loop or random
coil regions where gaps are more common.
The residues that are 'considered' to be
hydrophilic are set by '-hgapres'.
-maxdiv integer [30] This switch, delays the alignment of
the most distantly related sequences until
after the most closely related sequences
have been aligned. The setting shows the
percent identity level required to delay the
addition of a sequence; sequences that are
less identical than this level to any other
sequences will be aligned later. (Integer
from 0 to 100)
Advanced (Unprompted) qualifiers: (none)
Associated qualifiers:
"-sequence" associated qualifiers
-sbegin1 integer Start of each sequence to be used
-send1 integer End of each sequence to be used
-sreverse1 boolean Reverse (if DNA)
-sask1 boolean Ask for begin/end/reverse
-snucleotide1 boolean Sequence is nucleotide
-sprotein1 boolean Sequence is protein
-slower1 boolean Make lower case
-supper1 boolean Make upper case
-sformat1 string Input sequence format
-sdbname1 string Database name
-sid1 string Entryname
-ufo1 string UFO features
-fformat1 string Features format
-fopenfile1 string Features file name
"-outseq" associated qualifiers
-osformat2 string Output seq format
-osextension2 string File name extension
-osname2 string Base file name
-osdirectory2 string Output directory
-osdbname2 string Database name to add
-ossingle2 boolean Separate file for each entry
-oufo2 string UFO features
-offormat2 string Features format
-ofname2 string Features file name
-ofdirectory2 string Output directory
"-dendoutfile" associated qualifiers
-odirectory3 string Output directory
General qualifiers:
-auto boolean Turn off prompts
-stdout boolean Write standard output
-filter boolean Read standard input, write standard output
-options boolean Prompt for standard and additional values
-debug boolean Write debug output to program.dbg
-verbose boolean Report some/full command line options
-help boolean Report command line options. More
information on associated and general
qualifiers can be found with -help -verbose
-warning boolean Report warnings
-error boolean Report errors
-fatal boolean Report fatal errors
-die boolean Report dying program messages
|
| Standard (Mandatory) qualifiers |
Allowed values |
Default |
[-sequence]
(Parameter 1) |
(Gapped) sequence(s) filename and optional format, or reference (input USA) |
Readable sequence(s) |
Required |
[-outseq]
(Parameter 2) |
Sequence set filename and optional format (output USA) |
Writeable sequences |
<*>.format |
[-dendoutfile]
(Parameter 3) |
Dendrogram (tree file) from clustalw output file |
Output file |
<*>.emma |
| Additional (Optional) qualifiers |
Allowed values |
Default |
| -onlydend |
Only produce dendrogram file |
Toggle value Yes/No |
No |
| -dend |
Do alignment using an old dendrogram |
Toggle value Yes/No |
No |
| -dendfile |
Dendrogram (tree file) from clustalw file (optional) |
Input file |
Required |
| -pwmatrix |
The scoring table which describes the similarity of each amino acid to each other.
There are three 'in-built' series of weight matrices offered. Each consists of several matrices which work differently at different evolutionary distances. To see the exact details, read the documentation. Crudely, we store several matrices in memory, spanning the full range of amino acid distance (from almost identical sequences to highly divergent ones). For very similar sequences, it is best to use a strict weight matrix which only gives a high score to identities and the most favoured conservative substitutions. For more divergent sequences, it is appropriate to use 'softer' matrices which give a high score to many other frequent substitutions.
1) BLOSUM (Henikoff). These matrices appear to be the best available for carrying out data base similarity (homology searches). The matrices used are: Blosum80, 62, 45 and 30.
2) PAM (Dayhoff). These have been extremely widely used since the late '70s. We use the PAM 120, 160, 250 and 350 matrices.
3) GONNET . These matrices were derived using almost the same procedure as the Dayhoff one (above) but are much more up to date and are based on a far larger data set. They appear to be more sensitive than the Dayhoff series. We use the GONNET 40, 80, 120, 160, 250 and 350 matrices.
We also supply an identity matrix which gives a score of 1.0 to two identical amino acids and a score of zero otherwise. This matrix is not very useful. |
| b | (blosum) | | p | (pam) | | g | (gonnet) | | i | (id) | | o | (own) |
|
b |
| -pwdnamatrix |
The scoring table which describes the scores assigned to matches and mismatches (including IUB ambiguity codes). |
| i | (iub) | | c | (clustalw) | | o | (own) |
|
i |
| -pairwisedatafile |
Comparison matrix file (optional) |
Input file |
Required |
| -matrix |
This gives a menu where you are offered a choice of weight matrices. The default for proteins is the PAM series derived by Gonnet and colleagues. Note, a series is used! The actual matrix that is used depends on how similar the sequences to be aligned at this alignment step are. Different matrices work differently at each evolutionary distance.
There are three 'in-built' series of weight matrices offered. Each consists of several matrices which work differently at different evolutionary distances. To see the exact details, read the documentation. Crudely, we store several matrices in memory, spanning the full range of amino acid distance (from almost identical sequences to highly divergent ones). For very similar sequences, it is best to use a strict weight matrix which only gives a high score to identities and the most favoured conservative substitutions. For more divergent sequences, it is appropriate to use 'softer' matrices which give a high score to many other frequent substitutions.
1) BLOSUM (Henikoff). These matrices appear to be the best available for carrying out data base similarity (homology searches). The matrices used are: Blosum80, 62, 45 and 30.
2) PAM (Dayhoff). These have been extremely widely used since the late '70s. We use the PAM 120, 160, 250 and 350 matrices.
3) GONNET . These matrices were derived using almost the same procedure as the Dayhoff one (above) but are much more up to date and are based on a far larger data set. They appear to be more sensitive than the Dayhoff series. We use the GONNET 40, 80, 120, 160, 250 and 350 matrices.
We also supply an identity matrix which gives a score of 1.0 to two identical amino acids and a score of zero otherwise. This matrix is not very useful. Alternatively, you can read in your own (just one matrix, not a series). |
| b | (blosum) | | p | (pam) | | g | (gonnet) | | i | (id) | | o | (own) |
|
b |
| -dnamatrix |
This gives a menu where a single matrix (not a series) can be selected. |
| i | (iub) | | c | (clustalw) | | o | (own) |
|
i |
| -mamatrixfile |
Comparison matrix file (optional)' |
Input file |
Required |
| -[no]slow |
A distance is calculated between every pair of sequences and these are used to construct the dendrogram which guides the final multiple alignment. The scores are calculated from separate pairwise alignments. These can be calculated using 2 methods: dynamic programming (slow but accurate) or by the method of Wilbur and Lipman (extremely fast but approximate).
The slow-accurate method is fine for short sequences but will be VERY SLOW for many (e.g. >100) long (e.g. >1000 residue) sequences. |
Toggle value Yes/No |
Yes |
| -pwgapopen |
The penalty for opening a gap in the pairwise alignments. |
Number 0.000 or more |
10.0 |
| -pwgapextend |
The penalty for extending a gap by 1 residue in the pairwise alignments. |
Number 0.000 or more |
0.1 |
| -ktup |
This is the size of exactly matching fragment that is used. INCREASE for speed (max= 2 for proteins; 4 for DNA), DECREASE for sensitivity. For longer sequences (e.g. >1000 residues) you may need to increase the default. |
integer from 0 to 4 |
1 for protein, 2 for nucleic |
| -gapw |
This is a penalty for each gap in the fast alignments. It has little affect on the speed or sensitivity except for extreme values. |
Positive integer |
3 for protein, 5 for nucleic |
| -topdiags |
The number of k-tuple matches on each diagonal (in an imaginary dot-matrix plot) is calculated. Only the best ones (with most matches) are used in the alignment. This parameter specifies how many. Decrease for speed; increase for sensitivity. |
Positive integer |
5 for protein, 4 for nucleic |
| -window |
This is the number of diagonals around each of the 'best' diagonals that will be used. Decrease for speed; increase for sensitivity. |
Positive integer |
5 for protein, 4 for nucleic |
| -nopercent |
Fast pairwise alignment: similarity scores: suppresses percentage score |
Boolean value Yes/No |
No |
| -gapopen |
The penalty for opening a gap in the alignment. Increasing the gap opening penalty will make gaps less frequent. |
Positive foating point number |
10.0 |
| -gapextend |
The penalty for extending a gap by 1 residue. Increasing the gap extension penalty will make gaps shorter. Terminal gaps are not penalised. |
Positive foating point number |
5.0 |
| -[no]endgaps |
End gap separation: treats end gaps just like internal gaps for the purposes of avoiding gaps that are too close (set by 'gap separation distance'). If you turn this off, end gaps will be ignored for this purpose. This is useful when you wish to align fragments where the end gaps are not biologically meaningful. |
Boolean value Yes/No |
Yes |
| -gapdist |
Gap separation distance: tries to decrease the chances of gaps being too close to each other. Gaps that are less than this distance apart are penalised more than other gaps. This does not prevent close gaps; it makes them less frequent, promoting a block-like appearance of the alignment. |
Positive integer |
8 |
| -norgap |
Residue specific penalties: amino acid specific gap penalties that reduce or increase the gap opening penalties at each position in the alignment or sequence. As an example, positions that are rich in glycine are more likely to have an adjacent gap than positions that are rich in valine. |
Boolean value Yes/No |
No |
| -hgapres |
This is a set of the residues 'considered' to be hydrophilic. It is used when introducing Hydrophilic gap penalties. |
Any string is accepted |
GPSNDQEKR |
| -nohgap |
Hydrophilic gap penalties: used to increase the chances of a gap within a run (5 or more residues) of hydrophilic amino acids; these are likely to be loop or random coil regions where gaps are more common. The residues that are 'considered' to be hydrophilic are set by '-hgapres'. |
Boolean value Yes/No |
No |
| -maxdiv |
This switch, delays the alignment of the most distantly related sequences until after the most closely related sequences have been aligned. The setting shows the percent identity level required to delay the addition of a sequence; sequences that are less identical than this level to any other sequences will be aligned later. |
Integer from 0 to 100 |
30 |
| Advanced (Unprompted) qualifiers |
Allowed values |
Default |
| (none) |
Input file format
The input is two or more sequences.
Input files for usage example
File: globins.fasta
>HBB_HUMAN Sw:Hbb_Human => HBB_HUMAN
VHLTPEEKSAVTALWGKVNVDEVGGEALGRLLVVYPWTQRFFESFGDLSTPDAVMGNPKV
KAHGKKVLGAFSDGLAHLDNLKGTFATLSELHCDKLHVDPENFRLLGNVLVCVLAHHFGK
EFTPPVQAAYQKVVAGVANALAHKYH
>HBB_HORSE Sw:Hbb_Horse => HBB_HORSE
VQLSGEEKAAVLALWDKVNEEEVGGEALGRLLVVYPWTQRFFDSFGDLSNPGAVMGNPKV
KAHGKKVLHSFGEGVHHLDNLKGTFAALSELHCDKLHVDPENFRLLGNVLVVVLARHFGK
DFTPELQASYQKVVAGVANALAHKYH
>HBA_HUMAN Sw:Hba_Human => HBA_HUMAN
VLSPADKTNVKAAWGKVGAHAGEYGAEALERMFLSFPTTKTYFPHFDLSHGSAQVKGHGK
KVADALTNAVAHVDDMPNALSALSDLHAHKLRVDPVNFKLLSHCLLVTLAAHLPAEFTPA
VHASLDKFLASVSTVLTSKYR
>HBA_HORSE Sw:Hba_Horse => HBA_HORSE
VLSAADKTNVKAAWSKVGGHAGEYGAEALERMFLGFPTTKTYFPHFDLSHGSAQVKAHGK
KVGDALTLAVGHLDDLPGALSNLSDLHAHKLRVDPVNFKLLSHCLLSTLAVHLPNDFTPA
VHASLDKFLSSVSTVLTSKYR
>MYG_PHYCA Sw:Myg_Phyca => MYG_PHYCA
VLSEGEWQLVLHVWAKVEADVAGHGQDILIRLFKSHPETLEKFDRFKHLKTEAEMKASED
LKKHGVTVLTALGAILKKKGHHEAELKPLAQSHATKHKIPIKYLEFISEAIIHVLHSRHP
GDFGADAQGAMNKALELFRKDIAAKYKELGYQG
>GLB5_PETMA Sw:Glb5_Petma => GLB5_PETMA
PIVDTGSVAPLSAAEKTKIRSAWAPVYSTYETSGVDILVKFFTSTPAAQEFFPKFKGLTT
ADQLKKSADVRWHAERIINAVNDAVASMDDTEKMSMKLRDLSGKHAKSFQVDPQYFKVLA
AVIADTVAAGDAGFEKLMSMICILLRSAY
>LGB2_LUPLU Sw:Lgb2_Luplu => LGB2_LUPLU
GALTESQAALVKSSWEEFNANIPKHTHRFFILVLEIAPAAKDLFSFLKGTSEVPQNNPEL
QAHAGKVFKLVYEAAIQLQVTGVVVTDATLKNLGSVHVSKGVADAHFPVVKEAILKTIKE
VVGAKWSEELNSAWTIAYDELAIVIKKEMNDAA
|
EMBOSS programs do not allow you to simply type the names of two or more
files or database entries - they try to interpret this as all one
file-name and complain that a file of that name does not exist.
In order to enter the sequences that you wish to align, you must group
them in one of three ways: either make a 'list file' or place several
sequences in a single sequence file or specify the sequences using
wildcards.
Making a List file
A list file is a text file that holds the names of database entries
and/or sequence files.
You should use a text editor such as pico or nedit to edit
a file to contain the names of the sequence files or database entries.
There must be one sequence per line.
An example is the file 'fred' which contains:
opsd_abyko.fasta
sw:opsd_xenla
sw:opsd_c*
@another_list
This List files contains:
- opsd_abyko.fasta - this is the name of a sequence file. The file
is read in from the current directory.
- sw:opsd_xenla - this is a reference to a specific sequence in the
SwissProt database
- sw:opsd_c* - this represents all the sequences in SwissProt whose
identifiers start with ``opsd_c''
- another_list - this is the name of a second list file. List files
can be nested!
Notice the @ in front of the last entry. This is the way you tell
EMBOSS that this file is a List file, not a regular sequence file. That
last line was put there both as an indication of the way you tell EMBOSS
that a file is a List file and to emphasise that List files can contain
other List files.
When emma asks for the sequences to align, you should type
'@fred'. The '@' character tells EMBOSS that this is the name
of a List file.
An alternative to editing a file and laboriously typing in all of the
names you require is to make a list of a directory containing the
sequence files and then to edit the list file to remove the names of the
sequences files than you do not require.
To make a list of all the files in the current directory that end in
'.pep', type:
ls *.pep > listfile
Several sequences in one file
EMBOSS can read in a single file which contains many sequences.
Each of the sequences in the file must be in the same format - if the
first sequence is in EMBL format, then all the others must be in EMBL
format.
There are some sequence formats that cannot be used when placing many
sequences in the same file. These are sequence formats that have no
clear indication of where the sequence ends and the annotation of the
next sequence starts. These formats include: plain or text format (no
real format, just the sequence), staden, gcg.
If your sequences are not already in a single file, you can place them
in one using seqret. The following example takes all the files
ending in '.pep' and places them in the file 'mystuff' in Fasta format.
seqret "*.pep" mystuff
When emma asks for the sequences to align, you should type
'mystuff'.
Using wildcards
'Wildcard' characters are characters that are expanded to match all
possible matching files or entries in a database.
By far the most commonly used wildcard character is '*' which matches
any number (or zero) of possible characters at that position in the name.
A less commonly used wildcard character is '?' which matches any one
character at that position.
For example, when emma asks for sequences to align, you could answer:
abc*.pep
This would select any files whose name starts with 'abc' and then ends
in '.pep'; the centre of the name where there is a '*' can be anything.
Both file names and database entry names can be wildcarded.
There is a slightly irritating problem that occurs when wildcards are
used one the Unix command line (This is the line that you type against
the 'Unix' prompt together with the program name.)
In this case the Unix session gets the command line first, runs the
program, expands the wildcards and passes the program parameters to the
program. When Unix expands the wildcards, two things go wrong. You may
have specified wildcarded database entries - the Unix system tries to
file files that match that specification, it fails and refuses to run
the program. Alternatively, you may have specified wildcarded files -
Unix fileds them and gives the name of each of them to the program as a
separate parameter - emma gets the wrong number of parameters and
refuses to run.
You get round this by quoting the wildcard. You can either put the
whole wildcarded name in quotes:
"abc*.pep"
or you can quote just the '*' using a '\' as:
abc\*.pep
This problem does not occur when you reply to the prompt from the
program for the input sequences, or when you are typing the wildcard
files name in a web browser of GUI (such as Jemboss or SPIN) field
Output file format
Output files for usage example
File: hbb_human.aln
>HBB_HUMAN
--------VHLTPEEKSAVTALWGKVN--VDEVGGEALGRLLVVYPWTQRFFESFGDLST
PDAVMGNPKVKAHGKKVLGAFSDGLAHLDNLKGTFATLSELHCDKLHVDP----ENFRLL
GNVLVCVLAHHFGKEFTPPVQAAYQKVVAGVANALAHKYH------
>HBB_HORSE
--------VQLSGEEKAAVLALWDKVN--EEEVGGEALGRLLVVYPWTQRFFDSFGDLSN
PGAVMGNPKVKAHGKKVLHSFGEGVHHLDNLKGTFAALSELHCDKLHVDP----ENFRLL
GNVLVVVLARHFGKDFTPELQASYQKVVAGVANALAHKYH------
>HBA_HUMAN
---------VLSPADKTNVKAAWGKVGAHAGEYGAEALERMFLSFPTTKTYFPHF-----
-DLSHGSAQVKGHGKKVADALTNAVAHVDDMPNALSALSDLHAHKLRVDP----VNFKLL
SHCLLVTLAAHLPAEFTPAVHASLDKFLASVSTVLTSKYR------
>HBA_HORSE
---------VLSAADKTNVKAAWSKVGGHAGEYGAEALERMFLGFPTTKTYFPHF-----
-DLSHGSAQVKAHGKKVGDALTLAVGHLDDLPGALSNLSDLHAHKLRVDP----VNFKLL
SHCLLSTLAVHLPNDFTPAVHASLDKFLSSVSTVLTSKYR------
>MYG_PHYCA
---------VLSEGEWQLVLHVWAKVEADVAGHGQDILIRLFKSHPETLEKFDRFKHLKT
EAEMKASEDLKKHGVTVLTALGAILKKKGHHEAELKPLAQSHATKHKIPI----KYLEFI
SEAIIHVLHSRHPGDFGADAQGAMNKALELFRKDIAAKYKELGYQG
>GLB5_PETMA
PIVDTGSVAPLSAAEKTKIRSAWAPVYSTYETSGVDILVKFFTSTPAAQEFFPKFKGLTT
ADQLKKSADVRWHAERIINAVNDAVASMDDTEKMSMKLRDLSGKHAKSFQ----VDPQYF
KVLAAVIADTVAAGDAGFEKLMSMICILLRSAY-------------
>LGB2_LUPLU
--------GALTESQAALVKSSWEEFNANIPKHTHRFFILVLEIAPAAKDLFSFLKG--T
SEVPQNNPELQAHAGKVFKLVYEAAIQLQVTGVVVTDATLKNLGSVHVSKGVADAHFPVV
KEAILKTIKEVVGAKWSEELNSAWTIAYDELAIVIKKEMNDAA---
|
File: hbb_human.dnd
(
(
(
(
HBB_HUMAN:0.08080,
HBB_HORSE:0.08359)
:0.21952,
(
HBA_HUMAN:0.05452,
HBA_HORSE:0.06605)
:0.21070)
:0.06034,
MYG_PHYCA:0.39882)
:0.01490,
GLB5_PETMA:0.38267,
LGB2_LUPLU:0.50324);
|
Sequences
emma writes the aligned sequences and a dendrogram file showing how
the sequences were clustered during the progressive alignments.
The clustalw output sequences are reformatted into the default EMBOSS
output format instead of being left as Clustal-format '.aln' files.
Trees
Believe it or not, we now use the New Hampshire (nested parentheses)
format as default for our trees. This format is compatible with e.g. the
PHYLIP package. If you want to view a tree, you can use the RETREE or
DRAWGRAM/DRAWTREE programs of PHYLIP. This format is used for all our
trees, even the initial guide trees for deciding the order of multiple
alignment. The output trees from the phylogenetic tree menu can also be
requested in our old verbose/cryptic format. This may be more useful
if, for example, you wish to see the bootstrap figures. The bootstrap
trees in the default New Hampshire format give the bootstrap figures
as extra labels which can be viewed very easily using TREETOOL which is
available as part of the GDE package. TREETOOL is available from the
RDP project by ftp from rdp.life.uiuc.edu.
The New Hampshire format is only useful if you have software to display
or manipulate the trees. The PHYLIP package is highly recommended if
you intend to do much work with trees and includes programs for doing
this. WE DO NOT PROVIDE ANY DIRECT MEANS FOR VIEWING TREES GRAPHICALLY.
Data files
The comparison matrices available for clustalw are not EMBOSS matrix
files, as they are defined in the clustalw code. The matrices
available for carrying out a protein sequence alignment are:
- blosum
- pam
- gonnet
- id
- user defined
The comparison matrices available in clustalw for carrying out a
nucleotide sequence alignment are:
- iub
- clustalw
- user defined
Notes
None
References
The main reference for ClustalW is Thompson et al below.
- Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994)
"CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence
alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties
and weight matrix choice."
Nucleic Acids Research, 22:4673-4680.
- Feng, D.-F. and Doolittle, R.F. (1987). J. Mol. Evol. 25, 351-360.
- Needleman, S.B. and Wunsch, C.D. (1970). J. Mol. Biol. 48, 443-453.
- Dayhoff, M.O., Schwartz, R.M. and Orcutt, B.C. (1978) in Atlas of
Protein Sequence and Structure, vol. 5, suppl. 3 (Dayhoff, M.O., ed.),
pp 345-352, NBRF, Washington.
- Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. (1992). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89, 10915-10919.
- Lipman, D.J., Altschul, S.F. and Kececioglu,
J.D. (1989). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 4412-4415.
- Barton, G.J. and Sternberg, M.J.E. (1987). J. Mol. Biol. 198, 327-337.
- Gotoh, O. (1993). CABIOS 9, 361-370.
- Altschul, S.F. (1989). J. Theor. Biol. 138, 297-309.
- Lukashin, A.V., Engelbrecht, J. and Brunak, S. (1992). Nucl. Acids
Res. 20, 2511-2516.
- Lawrence, C.E., Altschul, S.F., Boguski, M.S., Liu, J.S., Neuwald,
A.F. and Wooton, J.C. (1993). Science, 262, 208-214.
- Vingron, M. and Waterman, M.S. (1993). J. Mol. Biol. 234, 1-12.
- Pascarella, S. and Argos, P. (1992). J. Mol. Biol. 224, 461-471.
- Collins, J.F. and Coulson, A.F.W. (1987). In Nucleic acid and
protein sequence analysis a practical approach, Bishop, M.J. and
Rawlings, C.J. ed., chapter 13, pp. 323-358.
- Vingron, M. and Sibbald, P.R. (1993). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
90, 8777-8781.
- Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994). CABIOS, 10, 19-29.
- Lthy, R., Xenarios, I. and Bucher, P. (1994). Protein Science, 3, 139-146.
- Higgins, D.G. and Sharp, P.M. (1988). Gene, 73, 237-244.
- Higgins, D.G. and Sharp, P.M. (1989). CABIOS, 5, 151-153.
- Higgins, D.G., Bleasby, A.J. and Fuchs, R. (1992). CABIOS, 8, 189-191.
- Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy,
W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
- Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987). Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425.
- Wilbur, W.J. and Lipman, D.J. (1983). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
80, 726-730.
- Musacchio, A., Gibson, T., Lehto, V.-P. and Saraste,
M. (1992). FEBS Lett. 307, 55-61.
- Musacchio, A., Noble, M., Pauptit, R., Wierenga, R. and Saraste,
M. (1992). Nature, 359, 851-855.
- Bashford, D., Chothia, C. and Lesk,
A.M. (1987). J. Mol. Biol. 196, 199-216.
- Myers, E.W. and Miller, W. (1988). CABIOS, 4, 11-17.
- Thompson, J.D. (1994). CABIOS, (Submitted).
- Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S. and Fitch,
W.M. (1981). J. Mol. Evol. 18, 38-46.
- Pearson, W.R. and Lipman,
D.J. (1988). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85, 2444-2448.
- Devereux, J., Haeberli, P. and Smithies, O. (1984). Nucleic Acids
Res. 12, 387-395.
- Felsenstein, J. (1989). Cladistics 5, 164-166.
- Kimura, M. (1980). J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111-120.
- Kimura, M. (1983). The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Felsenstein, J. (1985). Evolution 39, 783-791.
- Smith, R.F. and Smith, T.F. (1992) Protein Engineering 5, 35-41.
- Krogh, A., Brown, M., Mian, S., Sjlander, K. and Haussler,
D. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 235-1501-1531.
- Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R. and Thornton, J.M. (1994). FEBS
Lett. 339, 269-275.
- Bairoch, A. and Bckmann, B. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 2019-2022.
- Noble, M.E.M., Musacchio, A., Saraste, M., Courtneidge, S.A. and
Wierenga, R.K. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 2617-2624.
- Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. (1983) Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.
Warnings
None.
Diagnostic Error Messages
"cannot find program 'clustalw'" - means that the ClustalW program has
not been set up on your site or is not in your environment (i.e. is
not on your path). The solutions are to (1) install clustalw in the
path so that emma can find it with the command "clustalw", or (2)
define a variable (an environment variable of in emboss.defaults or
your .embossrc file) called EMBOSS_CLUSTALW containing the command
(program name or full path) to run clustalw if you have it elsewhere
on your system.
Exit status
It exits with status 0 unless an error is reported
Known bugs
None.
| Program name | Description |
|---|
| edialign |
Local multiple alignment of sequences |
| infoalign |
Information on a multiple sequence alignment |
| plotcon |
Plot quality of conservation of a sequence alignment |
| prettyplot |
Displays aligned sequences, with colouring and boxing |
| showalign |
Displays a multiple sequence alignment |
| tranalign |
Align nucleic coding regions given the aligned proteins |
Author(s)
Mark Faller (current e-mail address unknown)
while he was with:
HGMP-RC, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SB, UK
History
Completed 18 February 1999
Target users
This program is intended to be used by everyone and everything, from naive users to embedded scripts.
Comments
None